Subject:*
Name/Email:*
Message Icon:*
Message:*
url email imgsrc image php hide code quote
English Nederlands 
SAMPLE
alignleft aligncenter alignright bold italic underline linethrough   


 [more...]
Options:*
 

 

 
     
Re: Email newsletters: HTML vs plaintext quandry

by fiammybe on 2010/1/21 7:38:25

you might check out some HTML mail styling guides. Not all mail clients (Outlook 2003/webmail) has the same support for HTML tags.

You can find an extensive list of things to check out at http://www.anandgraves.com/html-email-guide
Re: Email newsletters: HTML vs plaintext quandry

by Madfish on 2010/1/20 21:37:44

Ok HTML it is, the provider also allows a plain text alternative version to be sent with it.

I tried putting together a nice 2-column layout, but it doesn't render that well in email clients. So I'm dropping back to a simple single column design without images.

There's 2,000 people on my list so if it doesn't work well I guess I'll be hearing about it :)
Re: Email newsletters: HTML vs plaintext quandry

by skenow on 2010/1/20 19:57:32

According to what I've read for best delivery to the most inboxes, email newsletters are best sent as both HTML and text. I kind of like to have both - the text version can't cloak links as easily.
Re: Email newsletters: HTML vs plaintext quandry

by nachenko on 2010/1/20 12:02:35

HTML.
Re: Email newsletters: HTML vs plaintext quandry

by Vaughan on 2010/1/20 11:38:47

i'm on linux, and i'm not stupid enough to click links willy nilly.. so HTML is perfectly fine for me :) always have preferred HTML mail.