Subject:*
Name/Email:*
Message Icon:*
Message:*
url email imgsrc image php hide code quote
English Nederlands 
SAMPLE
alignleft aligncenter alignright bold italic underline linethrough   


 [more...]
Options:*
 

 

 
     
Re: Is the 'keywords' metatag so long dead that we can just ignore it?

by McDonald on 2012/2/24 9:21:53

The (meta) keywords are used or can be used in PDF documents as created by the TCPDF library.

Unfortunately TCPDF outputs the keywords twice...
Re: Is the 'keywords' metatag so long dead that we can just ignore it?

by McDonald on 2011/11/15 4:37:09

Google Webmaster Central Blog:
Google does not use the keywords meta tag in web ranking
Re: Is the 'keywords' metatag so long dead that we can just ignore it?

by skenow on 2011/8/4 20:18:01

I'd leave in the option - I prefer to specify the keywords rather than accept what gets auto-generated. It may not be a positive SEO factor, but it's definitely not a negative factor, if done well.

http://www.seomoz.org/blog/googles-negative-ranking-factors-whiteboard-friday
Re: Is the 'keywords' metatag so long dead that we can just ignore it?

by fiammybe on 2011/8/4 2:21:21

I don't fill the keywords box most of the time. I think tags have taken that role now.

The summary is still used by sites like digg and facebook (and google+ maybe) to put next to a posted link.
Re: Is the 'keywords' metatag so long dead that we can just ignore it?

by McDonald on 2011/8/4 1:43:07

I don't fill in the keyword box with articles (Impression) or links (imLinks) anymore. Guess it's better to use one good relevant set of keywords throughout the whole website.