Re: new 2.0 release

the removal of the $icmsModule variable was part of the cleanups that were marked as 'to remove in 1.4' I remember. The fix for the modules should be to use icms::$module if I'm not mistaken.

Topic | Forum

Re: new 2.0 release

The global variable that was coming up empty was $impresscms (and sometime $icmsModule). I'm not sure where the disconnect occurred. It may have been assigned an old variable somewhere. Better to figure it out now.

Topic | Forum

Re: new 2.0 release

It is true that I did some major cleaning up of supposedly no-longer used attributes and functions in the core. Normally tests should have shown regressions, but no manual test is faultless I'm afraid.

The missing global is strange, I didn't change anything concerning that, as far as I know the content module did work during my latest tests.

Re: new 2.0 release

Found the sorting issue - a global was no longer available and needed to be replaced with icms:: static object. Discovered it as I was testing with the Content module - the admin page for it would not load after installing.

Re: new 2.0 release

Some additional findings that are not add-in library specific: sorting tables by clicking on the header link in a column is not working for custom tags, ratings, symlinks (pages), block positions, blocks, mimetypes, autotasks, and userranks. I verified these are working in 1.4.4. Trying to track it down now. I'm suspecting something with the IPF table class or filtering in the admin panel. What's missing in all of the links is "fct=" and the object name.

Re: new 2.0 release

Currently working through some of the PHP7+ errors and requirements and removing some things that aren't used, at least in a new install (msyql support during install, for example). I've been testing with PHP7.0 to start with.

Just navigating through the administration panel, the version checker does not work on PHP7.0. The version of SimplePie (1.8) now in this release requires PHP7.2. SimplePie 1.7 will run on PHP7.0 and will also run on PHP8

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

That's certainly a viable solution. I'll take care of that this evening.

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

I was thinking along the lines of using the existing UA field and having it do some double duty. Do nothing and we assume, based on the format of the tag, that it's for UA. If you have switched to GA4, include the G- at the beginning of the tag and we'll load the proper snippet.

Using the preloads is a good idea - I think we should go that route for this round. The next phase will be to find a better way to insert and manage them from the control panel.

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

Short term : can't we simply add an extra field to the ACP where users can put their GA4 number? That would allow both Universal Analytics and GA4 to coexist for the time being.

The idea of custom tags it not bad, but configuration of these features should always be kept limited to the ACP, so even if you define a custom tag to include GA4 or Fathom or any other service, we will need to figure out a way to define these identifiers freely in the ACP as well.

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

I was thinking - Custom Tags already provides a lot of the flexibility to add other snippets anywhere. What it still requires is a way to insert your tag without having to manually edit a template, if you want something to be in the header of your pages. If it can go in the body, you're set.

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

I think turning this into module would be a great idea.

Yes, many use Google but not everyone. Sometimes other analytics tools are better.

Re: Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

As I mentioned in another thread, this is something we need to address sooner rather than later. This is a bit tricky for us, because we have no way of determining if a site has gone through the migration from UA to GA4. All we store is the site code and if it is enabled, we pass the code to the core and it inserts the javascript on every page.

This could turn into a whole lot of different scenarios and options to handle through the core admin UI. Or, we can add documentation on how to add preloads that each admin would need to customize before deploying on their sites. Even now, I think of a preload generator that would allow an admin to paste in the code snippet from the other provider, select where it loads, and be able to manage it that way. That's for a later release.

For immediate consideration is what do we put into the new 2.0 release? My first reaction is to keep it simple - provide a GA4 preload template that admins can customize with their tag and include on their sites. The UA portion would remain and not interact with the GA4 plugin. Admins would need to determine the impact of having both active on a site. We deprecate the UA code with this release and move towards a more easily customized solution, removing the UA portions in a later release this year.

Moving on from Google Universal Analytics

Universal Analytics will be deactivated in a few months. If your site uses it, you will have received already quite a few reminders about moving to Google Analytics 4. But keep in mind that the data cannot be transferred.

Sunsetting a product is always a risk to retain users, as at that moment you force them to think about their needs, and perhaps they arrive at the conclusion that their needs are better met elsewhere.

ImpressCMS has been solely supporting UA in the past (we even come from the predecessor, but that's a long time ago). Perhaps in the future we should look into opening up this interface and making it possible to easily add new analytics products, and to have multiple analytics options simultaneously active.

I've played with a first version of a GA4 preload and it works more or less how it should : activating the plugin adds the GA4 javascript on the right location in the page. Future improvements will be:

  • make it possible to have multiple Analytics products active simultaneously on your page
  • Make it possible to customize the functionality with preload-specific configuration items

But for now, let's make it so that users are supported in migration from UA to GA4

Re: new 2.0 release

I agree with the Google UA towards Google Analytics 4 migration need. In the current stage, we can easily work with preloads. The issue should be discussed further though.

Re: new 2.0 release

Perhaps we also include a warning in the admin panel for the upcoming deactivation of UA and instructions on how to switch their ImpressCMS site once they have made the switch with Google.

Re: new 2.0 release

I was also thinking this release should address Google Analytics 4 over Universal Analytics - UA will stop working/reporting in 4 months (July 1).

This is kind of tricky, since we can't determine if a site has been converted, or if the new GA4 property tag has been created. Going through this for myself, the ID is different, so both the code and the ID need to be updated for a site.

I see you have implemented this as a plugin on this site, @fiammybe, and removed the section cf the core code that inserts the ga snippet into every page. Maybe we do that for both options - create preload plugins and have the administrator activate the one they use. Assume they are using UA (since that is what the core is injecting) and move that to preloads with the upgrade. Provide an alternative for GA4.

Re: new 2.0 release

My list:

Required -

  • New install completes successfully on PHP 7+
  • Works without error at minimum version - PHP 7.x
  • Works (may have warnings) on PHP 8.x. PHP 8.0 at a minimum
  • Module updates work
  • Module installs work
  • Able to save preferences
  • Editors work
  • User registration, profile updates, group memberships work
  • Upgrade works from previous versions (will need clear steps for PHP version change)
  • Other prerequisites clearly defined for what needs to be changed in configuration and settings (using PDO, for example)

Recommended -

  • How to determine if your modules are compatible - and a list of modules we've tested

Things we can't verify -

  • If a site is using a custom block or custom tag with PHP content, we can't validate it will work on PHP 7+
  • The same is true of extra plugins and preloads not distributed with the core

Re: New designation for our old 2.0 branch

That sounds like a great OpenAI idea. Didn't they have a generator for this type of images? Show me my photo how i'd look like captain picard?

I'll have a look, sounds like a fun project.

Re: new 2.0 release

Of course, I forgot that valentine's day is more of less the black Friday for the flower business.

I will update the estimated date on the Github milestone.

Just to make sure, what are precisely the situations to test? Php 7.0 until php 8.0?

Upgrade from 1.4.4?